Skip Navigation


Journal of Competition Law and Economics Advance Access originally published online on December 14, 2007
Journal of Competition Law and Economics 2008 4(2):311-334; doi:10.1093/joclec/nhm034
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
4/2/311    most recent
nhm034v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Briglauer, W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2007). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

CONCEPTUAL PROBLEMS WITH THE HYPOTHETICAL MONOPOLIST TEST IN EX-ANTE REGULATION OF COMMUNICATIONS UNDER THE NEW REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

Wolfgang Briglauer *

JEL: K21, L1, L11, L12

Under the new European regulatory communications framework that was enacted in 2002, market definitions are subject to a different and much more analytical scope. With regards to market definition, the new regulatory ex-ante framework explicitly adopts the so-called "Hypothetical Monopolist Test" (HMT), which has long been the state of the art in ex-post competition law. Direct empirical implementation based on rigorous statistical grounds is found to be exceedingly difficult. The very fact that the HMT is endorsed in ex-ante as well as ex-post jurisdictions, but rarely implemented directly in practice, underlines this point. Therefore, a proper understanding of the conceptual framework is of particular importance because this makes clear what the individual factors determining the outcome of the HMT are. Such understanding will serve as a valuable guidance in the decision-making process in line with the conceptual framework. This article discusses those aspects and gives applications from sector-specific communications markets. Doing this also illustrates that the HMT is, in principle, designed to be applied alongside all relevant market definition dimensions. Any methodological deviations from the HMT have therefore to be justified analytically.

* Austrian Regulatory Authority for Broadcasting and Telecommunications (RTR), Economics Division, Mariahilferstraße 77–79, 1060 Vienna, Austria. E-mail: wolfgang.briglauer{at}rtr.at. The author is grateful to Professor Christoph Weiss and to his colleagues Anton Schwarz, Paul Pisjak, and Christian Paiser for fruitful discussions on the draft paper. The author would also like to thank the editors and reviewers for their comments; special thanks for proofreading go to Mary Roettig. The views expressed are those of the author entirely and do not represent those of RTR or Telekom-Control-Kommission (TKK). The usual caveat applies.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.