Skip Navigation



Journal of Competition Law and Economics Advance Access published online on February 13, 2008

Journal of Competition Law and Economics, doi:10.1093/joclec/nhm035
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Breunig, R.
Right arrow Articles by Menezes, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2007). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

EMPIRICAL APPROACHES FOR IDENTIFYING MAVERICK FIRMS: AN APPLICATION TO MORTGAGE PROVIDERS IN AUSTRALIA

Robert Breunig * and Flavio Menezes **

JEL classification: G21, L0, L4

This paper develops an empirical strategy to identify maverick-like behavior. This strategy includes measuring two behavioral dimensions: (i) the extent to which particular suppliers underprice rivals; and (ii) the timing of the suppliers' responses to systemic cost changes. This strategy is applied to a dataset that contains interest rates charged by mortgage providers in Australia from January 2003 to October 2006. We then evaluate suppliers' behavior both in terms of the rates that they charge and the time it takes them to change their rates as a response to a systemic increase in costs that follows a change of the cash rate by the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA). We find that systematic price discounts and the frequency and timing of price increases and decreases are both important, but distinct, components of maverick-like behavior. These empirical observations suggest that the development of a theory for maverick behavior be focused on dynamic, asymmetric models and informed by institutions and market dynamics that are relevant to the case at hand.


* Associate Professor, The Australian National University. E-mail: Robert.Breunig{at}anu.edu.au

** Professor of Economics, The University of Queensland. E-mail: F.menezes{at}uq.edu.au. Both authors acknowledge the financial support of the ARC (grants DP 0557885 (Menezes) and 0663768 (Breunig and Menezes)). We are grateful to CANNEX for providing us with the data. We thank seminar participants at the 2007 Australian Law and Economics Conference and the 2007 Australian Meeting of the Econometric Society. The usual disclaimers apply.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.