Skip Navigation

Journal of Competition Law and Economics 2005 1(2):355-425; doi:10.1093/joclec/nhi009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geradin, D.
Right arrow Articles by O'Donoghue, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press 2005, all rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

The concurrent application of competition law and regulation: the case of margin squeeze abuses in the telecommunications sector

Damien Geradin * and Robert O'Donoghue **

This paper explores the issue of margin squeeze in the telecommunications sector. It observes that margin squeeze abuses can be addressed through ex ante and/or ex post intervention. As far as ex ante intervention is concerned, this paper reviews the various regulatory strategies that can be used to address margin squeeze before concluding that such conduct has been generally prevented through price controls. It then evaluates how wholesale and retail price control mechanisms can affect the ability and/or incentives of vertically integrated operators to engage in margin squeeze. As far as ex post intervention is concerned, this paper discussed the way in which margin squeeze has been addressed under national and EC competition law. It then explores several unresolved issues that emerge from the decisional practice of the competition authorities and the case law of the courts. Finally, the paper explores the interface between competition law and sector-specific regulation and in particular the jurisdictional and substantive conflicts that it can lead to in the area of margin squeeze.


*  Member of the Brussels bar. Professor of Law and Director of the Institute for European Legal Studies, University of Liège and Professor of Law and Director of the Global Competition Law Center (GCLC), College of Europe, Bruges. Email: d.geradin@ulg.ac.be.

** Barrister. Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, Brussels. Email: rodonoghue@cgsh.com. The authors would like to thank Simon Genevaz, Karina Gistelinck, Hertta Hyrkas, and Francesco Salerno for their assistance on certain issues of national law.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.